Tuesday, February 27, 2018

In Appreciation of Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse Rinpoche

HOW ZEN MASTERS FEED SHARKS

So few become full grown
And how necessary all the others
Gifts to the food chain
Feeding another universe


These big ones feed sharks

-GARY SNYDER


I remembered having read this Gary Snyder poem many years ago. Yesterday it popped up as a short comment in my mind, when an acquaintance of mine had expressed her displeasure about seeing so much of DJKR plastered all over FB. It's okay to be displeased, in so far as opinions are okay as merely opinions.  We don't need to make other peoples opinions our problems. If we do we will soon cease living our own life.

However, in some corner of my heart I felt hurt, not in a personal way.   I respect this precious teacher. And I likewise want to express my appreciation of his many activities. Why? Because he is not shying from giving himself away as shark feed, day in and day out.  You just need to watch the body language on the many videos, especially when he covers topics such as 'the role of the vajrayana in today's world'.  When I watch these videos, and I am sure it's a very personal reaction that few will share or need to agree with, I see him presenting himself and his words as if making an offering to hungry sharks.
 
And who are the sharks? We are. The immature 'dharma ending epoch' students who can't sit still, who can't shut up and be silent, who don't know how to listen... and who form opinions about a million things we don't understand, and then blabber them out, without even thinking.

By the way, when I talk about him making an offering, please do not misunderstand as if I wanted to paint him as victim.  Far from it.  Victims cannot make offerings, only sovereign beings can.  

Thursday, February 22, 2018

Sign Up for Vajrayana Training Only If You Want to Recognize the One Taste

This is in reaction to an article casting the vajrayana potentially in the light of a cult.  I believe it is counterproductive and a disservice to the world to even insinuate such possibility.  Because, according to my understanding once you have ventured into it no matter through which lineage as long as it is vital and alive, there is only one way out: enlightenment, liberation.  This is astounding, mind-boggling even: to be gifted with something that can totally liberate us.  Thus in my eyes, to deny the vajrayana's liberating power by questioning its efficacy, is far worse and far more shortsighted and self-destructive than taking a gun and shooting oneself in the foot.   The ensuing pain much greater and much longer lasting.

However, by formulating my critique, it is not my intention to insult anyone.  I mainly ask a lot of questions, questions that I am also asking myself, mostly using simple, straightforward language. I feel that such questions about the part we play in the unfolding of our own vajrayana path, need to be asked. Why? Because asking questions is an act of self-empowerment. Asking questions about my part in any story helps me to take responsibility for my own life and decisions, rather than passing the buck by blaming someone elseIsn't this the Buddhist approach?  If we understand the Buddha's teaching correctly, who outside of us is left to blame?  Is there really anyone? Anything?

I am simply writing for the sake of gaining greater clarity for self and others.  Why?  Because I find that refreshing. Because, this subject of the vajrayana, the vast possibilities it offers for human development, even for the development of unseen beings, is close to my heart.  

In a way, my own entire adult life has been dedicated to a deeper and more than intellectual grasp of this larger yet ungraspable all-encompassing reality that for a sake of a better word we call "my life & death", by applying vajrayana tools both in formal meditation and in real life situations.  You could say, I have a vested interest to find out if I might have been duped into following a cult, or not.  Although enough aspects of the way I can lead my life point to the fact that I haven't.  For that matter, I am not a part of any organization, not even any vajrayana organization.  Just a free bird (in as much as a bird can be free).

And we need to be clear, no?  Not just I, all of us.  Especially when we talk about the view and its concomitant practices that can cut through millions of lifetimes of suffering, which for many the vajrayana path has achieved, over the course of many centuries; not just since yesterday, or since someone founded a religious non-profit organization in the west.  Such liberating potential is a tall order to live up to, to say the least.  And also something to respect, not to be thrown before swines. 

Personally, I don't see much benefit in purely intellectual exchanges, mere opinions.  From my vantage, if we want to talk about something as a 'cult' because it has bothered even misled us, we first have to talk about ourselves.  After all, it is we who are engaging in it or have engaged in it, not some abstract entity.  When we talk about the vajrayana, we have to talk about our motivation to seek it out and follow it.  So, for the record, why do we, or did we become vajrayana practitioners?  What is/was our purpose?  What do/did we intend to gain, or lose?  That's where we have to start, if we want an honest answer that cuts to the bone, not just a fig leaf to cover our inner contradictions and outer inconsistencies.

And we did seek it out, didn't we?  We went even out of our way to join the club (if such was our limited understanding). It is certainly not a common thing to be instructed on how to meditate on fierce looking monsters, never mind that they are supposed to be manifestations of our own mind, or sit through long rituals performed in a language that we do not understand, and from a culture that may so alien to our own background and social customs and values, it might as well be from Mars.  Even if we maintain that it is a cult that we joined, in order for it to become one, we had to first join.  No one forced us. BTW and for your reference, the article in question appeared here: https://whatnow727.wordpress.com/2018/02/06/is-vajrayana-buddhism-a-cult-religion-part-2/


So, is the vajrayana a cult religion?  May be.  Anything can be anything.  It depends on how you look at it and how you use it.

However, when looking at it from the way it wants to be looked at and the way it sees itself, as a vehicle dedicated to the liberation from all (past and future) suffering for the benefit of all seen and unseen beings, ideally in one short lifetime, the answer is NO.  No, it is definitely not a cult.  From it's own perspective, which might be the only valid perspective, it is a particular view or set of views of our own being and our world at large, as well as a set of tools, all designed to liberate us from delusional suffering.  Why do I call its own perspective the "only valid perspective"?  Well quite simple: it's like a playing field.  You can't, for example, apply ice hockey rules on the football field and vice versa, or can you?  
 
When looking at it from an irrelevant secular western angle obsessed with ‘therapy’ and making everyone feel good, the answer could be ‘yes’.  But such ‘yes’ does not have any real bearing on the situation because, if I only want to feel good within the context of a new religious congregation of more of a social rather than a ultimate liberation-oriented nature, I don’t belong in any vajrayana circle to begin with.  With such motivation, am I not stating that I am not interested in fundamentally questioning myself, my mind, my conditioning? 
I that case, should I not practice the religion I was born with, or no religion at all?  At best should I not just act and behave like a decent human being free of any religious pretense?  Why then, do I have to drag the vajrayana into this?



Why does the Dalai Lama always say that kindness is his religion?  Precisely, you can’t go wrong with kindness.  You can’t make mistakes and harm anyone, or may be only unintentionally when in the application of your 'kindness' you go where even angles fear to tread.   

Whereas when you question everything, especially your imputed ‘self’, you can go wrong at many turns & therefore need good well-trained guidance, which you also need to be willing to follow.  Otherwise it doesn't work.  For example, my wife is a doctor.  She cannot work miracles, but she can do a few things.  However even then, can she do anything without her patients following her guidelines?  At least, some of them?  No she can't.  In the same way vajrayana without following a qualified guru is like practicing medicine without a doctor - and mind you a doctor who understands both the healthy function of the body & the disease, rather than just the disease. 



So, from my own background as a practitioner and independent observer I have read this article that makes the case for classifying vajrayana, or at least certain teachers and approaches to it as a cult.  According to my understanding it remains pointless.  It reveals a lot about the writer, but little about vajrayana.  Why for example, was the vajrayana always, but especially in its country of origin in India, considered a secret teaching, or set of secret teachings, to be followed and practiced under cover?  Precisely because it puts spiritual law above worldly law.  

Of course, we need to understand what the superiority of spiritual law infers and what it doesn't.  For example there is no spiritual law that says that the guru, for selfish worldly gain, is entitled to exploit, abuse or misuse the student.  Not in the books.  Nowhere.  But according to all appearances, the teacher could do something that in ordinary eyes looks a lot like such abuse of power, whereas in reality t isn't.  Who's to tell the difference?  Whose perception is sharp enough?  What standard will you use the measure the skillful means of a truly skillful teacher?  To decide if it is a case of a abuse, or a highly specific teaching meant and given under very specific circumstances to break through very specific mental obscurations, not only from this lifetime but from lifetimes ago?  Quoting Mingyur Ripoche or the Dalai Lama does not in the least settle the issue.



I have practiced vajrayana for several decades, with mainly three lamas, all of Nyingma background (two of whom were carefree yogis the least bit bothered about creating huge dharma centers and/or businesses, whereas the third, well he created and maintained many organizations over many years but has never been seen to operate them for his own personal benefit, not even for glorifying himself… it is actually hard to find more than a few token pictures of the guy on the net).  He truly sees no benefit in trying to be in the limelight.  And essentially, I have to agree with him, there isn’t any.  The limelight doesn’t help you when your aim is to foster deeper understanding in self and other.  The limelight only high-lightens the superficial.



Anyway, in the course of 40 years of practicing vajrayana, I was never requested to become an obedient follower, nor was I forced to think or do things I didn't want to think or do.  In fact, one of my teachers shouted at us when we gathered around him in a small group, “I want no followers, I want people who can think for themselves and act on their own cognizance, and then also take responsibility for it!”   The stress was laid especially on the latter.



The idea of 'samaya' or obligation to the teacher (and of the teacher to the student) has nothing in common with what the writer of this piece seems to assume what 'samaya' is. Samaya isn't meant to disempower or disenfranchise the individual. On the contrary, samaya is meant to empower the individual beyond the prison of the ego. If someone insists on staying imprisoned,no problem, join the club frequented by billions. Vajrayana has no problem with you joining or remaining there. It doesn't even think of itself as 'higher' and 'better'.



In the same way as we can see reality only in the way that we see it (namely based on past conditioning) vajrayana can only recognize diamond nature.  For it everything is a diamond.  If we want to shit on the diamond, that’s our privilege, but it doesn’t change anything for the diamond that still remains what it is, intrinsically pure.



When I stated above that I wasn't forced to do or think what I wouldn't have wanted to do or think, I did not intend to omit mentioning that in the course of these forty years my perceptions, concepts and presuppositions were indeed challenged.  Such happens without needing to be mentioned in any genuine vajrayana teacher/student relationship. Challenges arose, and naturally more than once.  In other words, at certain turns of events the teacher chose to exercise authority, most often in conventional ways, but sometimes also rather unconventionally.  Which is only fair, no teacher can be called such without exercising authority at some point.



However, in the end the authority of how to react to these challenges or 'power games' always stayed with me. An unpleasant situation arises, my teacher rescues me out of the frying pan only to throw me into the fire, what does such action trigger in me and how do I react to it? Preferably without thinking too much, like when answering a Zen koan. Honestly, from my gut.  

Of course, I could have felt unduly coerced sometimes.  But is it really coercion as long as I feel free to respond according to my own perception?  And I always felt that free, with all of my teachers.  Like at one point I had made an agreement with my lama of staying at a certain place and working with him there for three years.  My life situation changed and I wanted to leave after less than one.  He called me quite forcefully on my promise and let me know in no uncertain terms what he though of breach of contract, even threatened me implicitly to never see me again, and so forth.  We had three or four hour-long talks in the course of which he for moments berated and harangued me.  But when I stood up for my decision and left, even though I was clearly breaking my word, he did not make true on his threat of completely throwing me out.  We are still connected.  

So, was his berating and haranguing me verbal abuse?  Or was he testing my resolve?  Or what was it?  We will never know.  We will never know any of such things by conventional wisdom.  Which is why we shouldn't let conventional (actually non-) wisdom come between us and the teacher.  Anyway, what can a teacher really to impose his will on a student?  Pull a gun and shoot the sucker?  Shame and belittle me in front of others? May be he did the latter on occasion. But do I have no resources of my own? Am I four years old and helpless?



Furthermore, do I not have the power of discrimination to differentiate between hidden intent and manifest action? Are we all supposed to be bereft of our wits and senses that we need to be protected from harm for our own good? If that's the case, go and see a therapist, and preferably a sweet talker who loves to spin new prisons made from sweet talk around you. Avoid the vajrayana like the plague. It's for mature adults who have a strong sense of self, which allows them to go beyond it.



I don't think that there are any pitfalls to negotiate in any authentic vajrayana teaching situation other than the lies, deceit and never-ending trickiness of one's own conventional mind. However, there needs to be a fundamental and shared understanding on the part of the guru and the aspirant that such is indeed the nature of the work. That would be, so to speak the basic contract, spoken or unspoken.  Our common job and aim here, is to demolish falsity, and like in love and war, everything is allowed – except for the intention to harm, to degrade, to make use of, even when the means applied might appear to be harmful or even degrading.



O boy, this sure gets tricky, and requires a high level of alertness.



If anyone, teacher or student, thinks otherwise, then they should stay away. The vajrayana is not meant for everyone, never was never will be. And the only criticism that I can see myself making of some Lamas with big organizations is precisely that they probably allowed too big a following to form around them.  This is okay in the context of a general presentation of he teachings but not always the right forum for challenging people individually. 



There is this phrase that one of my Lamas kept repeating, "the warm breath of the guru" (like in the title of the book The Warm Breath of the Dakini). Inferring that when you get instructions, the guru needs to be so close that you feel his warm breath.



Which means that we are not talking big crowds, here. We are talking small groups, or even a one-on-one as the ideal teaching situation.   But again, not small therapy groups, but small vajrayana groups where everyone understands the nature and intent of the contract they entered.



Be that as it may. A watered down 'secular' vajrayana, custom made for our times and cultural hang-ups and preferences would defy the purpose.



About the hearsay (and no matter what everyone claims it will always only be hearsay) regarding other teachers and communities I have nothing to add, either.

Sign up for vajrayana training only if you want to recognize the 'one taste' - not for the sake of cultivating the eight worldly dharmas.

Friday, February 16, 2018

Lama Dawa's Nonchalant Dharma Essence Koan

...Which comes in a concise question and answer format

Student: "Lama, why do you like playing with people's minds so much?"

Lama: "Where is it?"


By the way:
HAPPY EARTH DOG YEAR

...and may the spirit of questioning reality ten times devour the tendency of falling asleep over repeating undigested second hand teachings that are only worshiped, not even remembered, let alone applied.

When Lama told Mingyur Dorje in Varanasi in December 2016 things that didn't appear to make any sense to him, Mingyur asked the above question and received the above answer.

Monday, February 12, 2018

Visiting the Ajanta Caves with Lama Dawa



“If we practice dharma depending on ordinary substance lineage power, we cannot have deep spiritual power.  The source of visible power is always invisible power… If we cannot connect visible substance power with invisible substanceless source, then it is quickly exhausted.  This is especially true today, when easterners and westerners are making dharma factories, trying to bargain with substance lineage for power and gain.


-THINLEY NORBU





Like it appeared to be his habit regarding so many ‘future’ developments, Lama Dawa introduced his idea of visiting the Buddhist caves in Ajanta already in September 2009, way before it actually happened.  He informed me from Kathmandu over the phone, “You and I have to go to Ajanta together, find out about flights and hotels.”  Then he repeated, “You and I will really have to go there together in this lifetime.”  He sounded absolutely determined.  So I did the needful research, only to hear in another phone call a few days later something like, “Not this year, I am not feeling well and the place is too hot at this time of the year anyways.



Many months passed and nothing was ever mentioned again, until Lama stayed at our house in Goa for eight weeks, late December 2012 to late February 2013.  We had picked him and Khandro Kalsang up in Nepal and flown together down to South India.  When he had reached our home close to midnight on December 26th, despite his weak hip joints that usually gave him much pain, especially when climbing and descending stairs, he rushed up the one flight of stairs, immediately claimed the large bed in our bedroom as his, almost jumped into perfect lotus seat on top of it and stated, “You and I have to go to Ajanta together when we are done here.”  And his entire face lit up beaming with delight.



He was like that.  Important things were said exactly when the moment had come to say them.  After a close to 15-hour journey from door to door, the last thing I would have thought about would be another trip.  But Lama, at least in his dealings with me, always disclosed his purpose and intention right at the start of any venture.  He never said more than what needed to be said, but at least that much he shared.  So, the purpose of the 2-month respite in Goa had now been officially declared right at the outset: to get well, and then to visit Ajanta.



The mood for the trip built up over the weeks while Rinpoche regained physical strength.  Despite of all his displays of humbleness and ordinariness and the almost complete concealing of his light and power, Lama was anything but an ordinary man, not even an ordinary yogi hung up on any concept of being one.  Many an evening he sat with us on the terrace and shared stories, about his yogic family lineage (as a result he also introduced us to his family lineage protector practice).  But most extensively he talked about the glorious siddha past of India.  He spoke so much about it, really revealing a lot about ancient India that is not in the texts (or if it is there, then concealed in twilight language).  It truly was amazing. 



I was such a fool not to record these fairly regular evening talks, which usually lasted for a little over an hour.  I should have put the smart phone on the coffee table and press the ‘record’ button.  But it didn’t even occur to me that I should.  Rinchen and I were just sitting with him and Kalsang mesmerized by his talk, forgetting everything else.  It was as if he was sensitizing us to something important, of which we couldn’t fathom exactly what it was, at least not on the level of the ordinary waking consciousness.  Nonetheless and in another way, sensitized we were, indeed.  Even though he didn’t give any formal teachings (I actually had requested him not to, and to instead focus on his health), while with us during these weeks he shared more – more of the tendrel that personally connected us, more of his vast storehouse of merit going back to times immemorial, more of his ancient roots, the fertile soil of the teachings here in the land where the Buddha appeared in this world – than he did ever before or would do ever after.



By Losar in the beginning of February his whole body was literally sparkling, bursting with
energy.  And to all in our small dharma group who attended the celebration, the party in the evening will remain etched in their mindstream.  Neill played the guitar and sang Hindi songs that Lama requested and then Lama himself sang Hindi movie songs and serenaded the ladies like they probably hadn’t been serenaded before.  Rarely have I seen him so happy (but then of course, I haven’t seen him so much in the course of an entire lifetime… it’s all relative, right).



A day before the flight to Bombay and Aurangabad (the nearest airport to Ajanta) he called me to the room and explained, “In case I will have a seizure in a public place, you will have to press certain points on my head.  If you do, it will be over very quickly.”  Then, with his right hand he guided both my hands successively to the points on his skull that he wanted pressed, three times and admonished me not to forget.



We got from Goa to Bombay airport for an almost four hour layover (the connecting flight was late).  Once we had arrived in the transit hall, he looked for the bar and demanded wine – and lots of it.  He didn’t mind that it was of shabby quality and way overpriced (something like 12 dollars a small glass).   He talked loud and dirty sex and other obscenities, which made people around us uncomfortable.  They began staring in our direction, but this didn’t faze him in the least. 



He was on a roll, and mind you, all of this display was a teaching however of a kind that is too much to handle for most, especially when delivered in the plain view of a disapproving public.  But we were going to Ajanta, right!  And not as ordinary sightseers, but in order to make an energy connection in this present bodymind – with our voices, our flesh and bones – linking what is conceptualized as ‘past’ through the (also conceptualized) ‘present moment’ with what is conceptualized as ‘future’ (which of course, when misunderstood gives birth to a million conceptualizations more).  He probably tried to make abundantly clear that we NOT regard ourselves as ordinary tourists, but as yogis and yoginis on a pilgrimage.   

How much he tried in the last twenty years of his life to lift people out of the prison of conventionality, and how little and infrequently people actually understood what he was trying to do! 



Anyway, to all appearances that is, to crown it all he also tried to kiss one of the ladies in our small group fully on the mouth with what looked like a perfect tongue kiss in the making, in front of everyone.  However, he stopped himself in the middle when it became obvious that the person in question could not understand the underlying intention, so different from the usually accepted meaning of the gesture.  He always tried everything to break concepts, but never forced the issue when a certain level of resistance was encountered.  When our flight was finally called, everyone except him was happy that the spectacle was over, at least this part of it.



Then, while in the bus from the gate to the plane Lama had himself a seizure.  Well, he had already announced to me in Goa that he would, or at least prepared me for it.  At that moment, he and I were separated from the rest of the group.  They had taken seats, whereas we were on the rear platform of the bus, he sitting in his wheelchair, I standing next to him. 



This being Bombay airport and not a western airport, the bus was naturally overcrowded.  If you have travelled in India you know what level of overcrowding I am talking about.  When the seizure set in, I was stunned, absolutely taken by surprise.  I am sure this kind of seizure always had been very painful and uncomfortable for Lama to experience, but at least in this case, from the outside it almost looked serene.  Yes, there were convulsions, the body shook, the eyeballs rolled, but through my eyes it appeared like an unfolding celebration in slow motion.  It actually looked beautiful, like some tremendous benevolent energy release.  Lama had to wake me from my stupor, by shouting, “Press the points.”  I did.  Whereupon the seizure almost immediately stopped, as he had said in Goa, that it would.



Naturally, the people around us were shocked and tried to move away from us as far as possible, even more so those who had witnessed Lama’s raucous behavior in the bar.  When we descended from the bus one of the staff who had also been on the rear platform walked up to us and asked, “Can this gentleman fly in this condition?”  Lama assured him that he could, and in order to make his point, got up from his wheelchair and walked all the way from the front stair to the stair at the rear entrance, as wheelchair passengers are always supposed to sit in the last row, near the restrooms.  In India, they let such things, like Lama’s (for a lack of a better word) eccentricities gracefully go.  In the US he would probably have stayed grounded and forced to accept hospital care, like it or not.



We arrived in Aurangabad very late.  Some more people joined us there the next day, to make it a group of eight instead of five.



The Ajanta caves are a 2- to 3- hour taxi ride away from Aurangabad.  We went there a day later, to find that much had changed since Lama’s first visit in the early 1970s.  For example, no vehicles were allowed to approach the entrance except for an official bus that ferried visitors from the nearby parking lot to the site.  But the bus stop was a more than a kilometer walk away from the parking lot.  Lama couldn’t walk that far.  So we asked one of the small fast food stalls nearby if we could borrow a chair, on which we carried Lama to the bus stop.  He was so incredibly light that day, easy to carry, even more so as there were three men so that one could take a break in between to catch his breath.  We asked the person at the bus stop to safeguard the chair for us for our return to the car.



But Lama wouldn’t be Lama if he didn’t surprise us the next day when we visited the Ellora caves, where we were confronted with a similar situation and tried to solve it the same way by carrying Lama on a chair.  It was impossible.  That next day Lama was not feather light any longer but as heavy as 1000 pounds of lead.  We couldn’t even lift the chair with Lama on it let alone carry him along.  We had to find a wheelchair.  He refrained from commenting.  To him nothing had changed.



These are little details, easy to overlook.  But again, these are teachings.  Don’t take anything regarding a true (not a sham) Lama for granted.  True lamas can behave raucously with elegance – and not really mean it, and neither would they care in the least.  They can have an epileptic seizure and let the activation of pressure points stop the same seizure within a second.  They can be, without changing anything in terms of outside appearance like size or height, a mere 25 Kgs light or a 1000 pounds heavy.  They can do and be all kinds of things, because they are never stuck in appearance, and never separate from dharmakaya.  What a blessing to be with such a Lama, such a genuine guru – and yet experience his indirect hints at his powers in a rather matter-of-fact way: not going gaga over them, and not becoming overly holy or sanctimonious.



At the actual entrance we found some porters who carried him on a sedan chair.  At the end of their two hours of carrying they were rewarded with a huge tip.  When in India, almost as a rule, Lama liked to tip the lowly lavishly – except for the few he saw were non-deserving.  Hard to tell how he determined such matters.  However, it was clear that the withholding of a tip was never accidental, but also not solely due to bad service rendered.  There were other aspects that he saw, invisible to ordinary vision. 



Reaching the caves finally, Lama was deeply moved.  He had a strong past connection with the place; so much was obvious for one with eyes to see.  It seemed to feel like a homecoming for him.   He gave explanations about some of the artwork quite different from what can be read in the guidebook.  But mostly he was happy, and treated all of us with extra warmth and love, for example by holding hands while sitting in silence for a short while, at the entrance or inside of a cave.



At one point when we had just come out one particular cave, I don’t recall which one he grabbed me by one hand, pulled me forcefully close to him, while whispering, “This is the right place and moment! It has to be done now! With his he lifted his right arm to the sky the hand in the threatening gesture, banning evil obstructing and interrupting forces.  Then he laughed and pushed me away.  In some ways I felt a bit bewildered, in another sense an inner knowing only commented, “Of course.”  What ever he does in such moments is of significance… as long as the ego doesn’t blow it by blowing itself out of proportion.  Then it becomes insignificant after the fact.



Inside the cave with the large stupa, one of the most famous and most photographed caves, at the moment when we visited filled with a large group of Indian tourists, Lama started to chant the refuge formula in Sanskrit, very slowly and deep from the belly.  The whole place was reverberating with his voice, and not only his voice but with the joy of genuine devotion to the dharma.  Some very old bond was being renewed. 



Afterwards many of the strangers came to Lama, tried to touch his feet and asked for his blessings.  It did not matter to them that they did not know him.   It did not matter that he wasn’t wearing any visible signs pointing to one kind or another of religious affiliation, like a robe.  (In India, Lama preferred to move around in civvies & incognito, always, never in robes.)  However, they had recognized something deeply embedded in their own mindstream with the help of a certain inborn openness to finer energies that most Indians still possess even under the veneer of modernity, and that is the quality of devotion.  Their inborn affinity to feelings and acts of devotion immediately reacted to Lamas expression of his genuine devotion to the dharma. 




All of this was beautiful to witness.  We left the caves fully energized and joyfully.  Lama was indeed very satisfied with the trip.










Thursday, February 8, 2018

Buddhist Yoga - Or the Continuous Diving into Direct Experience


Originating from the teachings of the Buddha, the form of yoga that I teach and call Nadi Prana is mainly about releasing, through the body, our clinging to the same old habits and patterns that make us suffer. 

In a Buddhist approach there cannot be any other purpose or goal, as the Buddha restricted himself to pointing out ways that help beings to eradicate the causes of suffering, which are created from grasping certain dynamics produced by our own mindstream, based on past tendencies.   

Because we grasp a lot and mostly unknowingly our ego-centered and fixated concepts and patterns, make us at first suffer mostly emotionally and mentally. But further down the line, the same trends manifest as physical illness.  All physical problems start as mental/emotional problems before they turn into an outright disease.  And all mental/emotional problems have a common ground in the rigidity, the lack of flexibility in our bodies and senses.

Since melting down rigidity is the first goal post to pass in NadiPrana, not any prefabricated idea of perfection, in this yoga, we are not trying to achieve the ideal posture that plays into and/or reinforces or idealized self-image.  We use postures only for the purpose that they may reflect back for us to see and feel first hand what is happening in our bodies and minds.  In these postures, we can observe ourselves in slow motion so to speak.  As a result, feeling deeply what is passing through us, we become gradually more and more natural.  Our suffering over emotions, concepts and ideas decreases. Although this takes time and we will need some patience.



In the words of Tarthang Tulku, the process works something like this: 

Breathing we allow our awareness of the sensation to expand, noting how it ripples outward, shifting its tone over time.  Fierce anger rises, peaks, and settles down.  Amusement may come up suddenly in its wake, leaving a trail of shining bubbles as it flows through us.  It is all subject to change.  It is gradually changing.  As we allow ourselves to feel the great breadth and depth of our sensations, they lose their discreteness, merging with one another at their outer edges.  The stormy weather ebbs away. Leaving us in a quiet sea.”  





But we can explain the result of such practice even more simply, more in terms of our actual palpable, physical experience.  



In these terms, the benefits of Buddhist yoga help us set in motion and enjoy a feedback loop of open-ended and natural, uncontrived positivity.  It starts out with relaxing body and mind.  That’s what we do in the physical exercise. Even when they are a little strenuous we focus on the deeper relaxation that follows


  • Through relaxation we become more aware
  • Through becoming more aware we awaken to our direct sensory experiences
  • Through awakening the senses we start enjoying every moment
  • Through such enjoyment we start nurturing our whole being
  • Through nurturing our whole being we are becoming grounded in our own reality
  • Through becoming grounded and real we feel embodied in all aspects of our lives
  • Feeling thus fully embodied makes us even more relaxed, while likewise deepening our responsiveness
  • Deeper relaxation and responsiveness deepen awareness even further
  • Such deeper awareness empowers our sensory experiences to become even more fine-tuned, subtle and even transformative
  • And so forth


Nadi Prana is not a head oriented practice.  Thinking about it won't help.  We have to hand over comman from the head to the bosy, so to speak.   In this way over time we learn how to let the entire unbroken bodymind guide us, not just the brain, let alone our ideas of ‘how things are supposed to be and function according to the mind's dictate of preconceived notions.  Buddhist yoga has no issue or problem with the body and the senses.  It doesn’t look down on them.  It actually cherishes the body in a non-ego fixated way – as an ever-flowing continuum, or as the "wish fulfilling jewel".




Being with the body, moving it (mostly) slowly (but sometimes also fast) and feeling the feelings that such movement and attention produces, in and of itself will over time dissolve all preconceived limited ideas and notions that we have.  When the body feels more alive, it becomes less of a conceptual prison but a matrix through which the freedom of spirit can be naturally expressed.



Through the yoga of the Buddha, the open-ended feedback loop of direct experience will make us physically and emotionally much more flexible.



© Choyin Dorje 2018